Lawmakers could remove the statute of limitations for felony sex crimes

The House public safety committee heard public testimony Tuesday, Jan. 22, on two bills that address the statute of limitations in certain felony sex offenses as well as another bill that would establish best practices for storing and processing of sexual assault kits.

By Emma Epperly

Washington Newspaper Publishers Association

The House public safety committee heard public testimony Tuesday, Jan. 22, on two bills that address the statute of limitations in certain felony sex offenses as well as another bill that would establish best practices for storing and processing of sexual assault kits.

Both bills are sponsored by Rep. Dan Griffey (R-Allyn), who has been working for many years to get the statute of limitation changed for sex offences.

House Bill 1231 would add child molestation in the first degree and rape of a child in the first degree to the list of offenses that do not have a statute of limitations. House Bill 1234 would add rape in the first, second, and third degrees, as well as other sex offenses, to the list of sex offenses with no statute of limitations.

Griffey’s goal is to get the broad changes made that are outlined in the second bill; however, Griffey testified that both bills are written to allow for amendments that extend the statute of limitations on a variety of sex offenses. The House has passed similar legislation in the past but the Senate has not.

“When you talk to some of the survivors, they really believe that the person that existed before the offense doesn’t exist any longer,” said Griffey, who told both his wife and daughter’s sexual assault stories at the hearing.

The committee also heard testimony on House Bill 1166 sponsored by Rep. Tina Orwall (D-Des Moines) on supporting sexual assault survivors. This bill is the product of the joint legislative task force on sexual assault forensic examination best practices.

If passed into law, HB 1166 calls for a yearlong moratorium to the destruction of unreported sexual assault kits, which contain physical evidence collected from victims but when the victim has not yet reported a crime to law enforcement. The task force plans to work on where the kits are to be stored in the future and the process in which they will be handled, during the moratorium. The storage issue is the reason that the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs are in opposition of the bill.

The bill would create timelines for the submission and processing of sexual assault kits. It establishes a 45-day standard for the processing of kits collected.

The state Attorney General’s Office testified in favor of extending the statute of limitations from one year to two years following the identification of a suspect through DNA testing or photograph.

HB 1166 also creates a victim, witness and survivor bill of rights and extends the SAFE (sexual assault forensic examination) Task Force until December 2021.